Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 28, after recital 2

Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement

Vote
Amendment 28, after recital 2
Result
125 for · 536 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0041/2025 – Malik Azmani – After recital 2 – Am 28
Vote id
174293
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 125 for, 536 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 19 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 43Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 130Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 73Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 164Abst. 2No vote 18 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 17Against 60Abst. 0No vote 3 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.67
PatriotsFor 65Against 8Abst. 7No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 7Abst. 1No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium040
Bulgaria030
Germany070
Denmark040
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0130
Ireland060
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 47

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 47 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Proposal to vote on amendments The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter seasonProcedural126 for, 542 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 19 %r · shared0.88 635 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 65 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment127 for, 473 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 584 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 46 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment122 for, 504 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 593 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 8 — part 2 Dissolution of political parties and the crackdown on the opposition in MaliAmendment93 for, 439 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 523 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to Article 1 — part 2 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment112 for, 479 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 586 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 26 2023 and 2024 reports on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAmendment114 for, 543 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 646 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 20 to paragraph 8 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment112 for, 520 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 632 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 7 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment107 for, 551 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 641 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaAmendment96 for, 546 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 632 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 52 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment126 for, 506 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 598 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 28, after recital 2 — Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174293, reference 2024/0187(CNS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174293 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174293,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 28, after recital 2 — Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174293}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174293},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174293, reference 2024/0187(CNS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}