Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Request for urgent procedure

Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Request for urgent procedure
Result
427 for · 221 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
1 April 2025, 13:07
More facts (4)
Effect
Urgent procedure agreed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
C10-0038/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
Vote id
174288
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Urgent procedure agreed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 1Against 125Abst. 1No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 2No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 171Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 2No vote 3 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 13Against 4Abst. 8No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia001
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland020
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 662 members

No vote recorded, 56

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 56 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.97 503 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 652 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
6 Jul 2026Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and DenmarkOther283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.95 400 voters
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.94 585 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.94 544 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 657 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 7 — part 3 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment386 for, 211 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.93 574 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 64 + 129 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment442 for, 216 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.92 612 voters
22 Jan 2025Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in BelarusAmendment429 for, 205 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Request for urgent procedure — Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 1 April 2025. votingId 174288. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/174288 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-01/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-01-174288,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Request for urgent procedure — Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-01},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/174288}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/174288},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174288. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01 (CC BY 4.0)}
}