Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals

Vote
Final vote
Result
486 for · 171 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
1 April 2025, 13:12
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Official label
A10-0020/2025 – Dimitris Tsiodras – Commission proposal and amendments
Vote id
173693
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 72 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 2Against 70Abst. 7No vote 1 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 0Against 71Abst. 8No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 6Abst. 2No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany701
Spain010
Greece121
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 675 members

No vote recorded, 43

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 43 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Final vote Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal481 for, 170 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.98 671 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 585 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 567 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Separate vote on recital T Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSeparate vote429 for, 153 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 569 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.96 554 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 568 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 564 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote451 for, 165 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.95 586 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 570 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote — Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals”. Vote, 1 April 2025. votingId 173693, reference 2023/0455(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/173693 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 1 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-01/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-01-173693,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-01},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/173693}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-01/173693},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 173693, reference 2023/0455(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-01-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-01 (CC BY 4.0)}
}