Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group

Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left Group

Vote
Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 31 Mar 2025
Result
110 for · 335 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
31 March 2025, 18:18
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left Group
Vote id
174287
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 110 for, 335 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 24 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 29Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 1No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 4Against 74Abst. 0No vote 58 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 0Against 53Abst. 0No vote 22 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 2Against 114Abst. 0No vote 72 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 39 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 7Against 49Abst. 3No vote 27 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
ESNFor 11Against 1Abst. 1No vote 13 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 13Against 3Abst. 1No vote 11 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia100
Germany811
Poland100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 451 members

No vote recorded, 267

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 267 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 2, adding text after recital D Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment119 for, 407 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 358 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 397 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment113 for, 441 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 397 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 57 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment119 for, 490 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 411 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 Competition policy – annual report 2024Amendment89 for, 411 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 360 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment116 for, 527 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 407 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 360 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point h Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment130 for, 515 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 415 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 45, adding text before paragraph 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment111 for, 511 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 404 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after recital F Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 511 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 392 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174287
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left Group”. Vote, 31 March 2025. votingId 174287. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174287 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-31/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-31-174287,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday's agenda — Request by the The Left Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the The Left Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-31},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174287}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174287},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174287. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31 (CC BY 4.0)}
}