Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group

Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group

Vote
Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 31 Mar 2025
Result
82 for · 357 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
31 March 2025, 18:14
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group
Vote id
174285
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 82 for, 357 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 1Abst. 0No vote 17 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 78Abst. 3No vote 53 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 2Against 45Abst. 2No vote 26 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 0Against 115Abst. 0No vote 73 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 39Abst. 1No vote 40 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 59Abst. 0No vote 27 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 13Abst. 0No vote 13 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 7Abst. 5No vote 11 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium011
Bulgaria011
Germany030
Denmark030
Spain010
Finland010
France1100
Ireland030
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Sweden030
Slovenia110
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 450 members

No vote recorded, 268

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 268 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 351 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 351 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.93 350 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment101 for, 501 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 388 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 411 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 386 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 411 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 4 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2024Amendment104 for, 495 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 392 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 169 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 493 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 392 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 408 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174285
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group”. Vote, 31 March 2025. votingId 174285. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174285 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 31 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-31/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-31-174285,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Tuesday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-31},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174285}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-31/174285},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174285. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-31-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-31 (CC BY 4.0)}
}