Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 18

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 18
Result
284 for · 273 against · 57 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 March 2025, 12:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: EPP, ECR
Official label
B10-0143/2025 – § 18
Vote id
172927
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 284 for, 273 against, 57 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 46 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 25Against 38Abst. 2No vote 10 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
EPPFor 35Against 80Abst. 39No vote 34 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
ECRFor 0Against 60Abst. 1No vote 19 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 10No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 3No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium040
Bulgaria012
Germany070
Denmark040
Estonia110
Spain010
Finland030
France820
Ireland140
Lithuania110
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands330
Poland010
Portugal010
Romania210
Sweden020
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote254 for, 315 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.81 494 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote258 for, 290 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 495 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 352 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 599 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 495 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 494 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 Public procurementAmendment264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 555 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG Public procurementAmendment250 for, 384 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 557 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in LebanonOther181 for, 259 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 41 %r · shared0.80 391 voters
9 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 17 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSeparate vote272 for, 307 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.79 532 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE Public procurementAmendment254 for, 356 against, 37 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 556 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 18 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights”. Vote, 13 March 2025. votingId 172927, reference 2024/2829(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172927 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-13-172927,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 18 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172927}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172927},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172927, reference 2024/2829(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}