Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 13 — part 1

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 13 — part 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 13 Mar 2025
Result
440 for · 137 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 March 2025, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: Renew, EPP · separate vote: ECR
Official label
B10-0143/2025 – § 13/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0143
Dossier
2024/2829(RSP)
Vote id
172912
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 440 for, 137 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Is alarmed that European company law provisions, as well as their interpretation in some legal cases, are creating loopholes and are enabling the circumvention of mandatory national board-level participation rules;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 5Against 61Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 137Against 16Abst. 4No vote 31 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 4Against 53Abst. 6No vote 17 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 63Against 4Abst. 10No vote 9 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 2Against 3Abst. 19No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 20Against 0Abst. 6No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Bulgaria010
Cyprus001
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain100
Finland010
France002
Greece001
Croatia010
Italy0160
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0190
Romania212
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 622 members

No vote recorded, 97

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 97 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment512 for, 84 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 581 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 1, adding text after citation 1 Detention of EU citizens in the occupied areas of CyprusAmendment424 for, 158 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.70 533 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAmendment423 for, 120 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 502 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 2 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote448 for, 169 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.65 572 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment373 for, 155 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ECR, The Leftr · shared0.64 510 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 46 to paragraph 4 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment432 for, 207 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.62 589 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 4 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment350 for, 187 against, 56 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECR, The Leftr · shared0.59 515 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 19 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAmendment480 for, 105 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.58 548 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment316 for, 260 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 54 %r · shared0.58 518 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 18 Polarisation and increased repression in Serbia, one year after the Novi Sad tragedyAmendment111 for, 213 against, 311 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.53 551 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172912
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 13 — part 1 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights”. Vote, 13 March 2025. votingId 172912, reference 2024/2829(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172912 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-13-172912,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 13 — part 1 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172912}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172912},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172912, reference 2024/2829(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}