Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 6

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 6
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 13 Mar 2025
Result
429 for · 175 against · 22 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 March 2025, 12:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
B10-0143/2025 – § 5/6
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0143
Dossier
2024/2829(RSP)
Vote id
172891
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 429 for, 175 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “considers, furthermore, that no EU financial support should go to undertakings that do not comply with the applicable working and employment conditions and/or employer obligations resulting from EU or national labour law or the relevant collective agreements;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 121Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 2Abst. 0No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 133Against 22Abst. 0No vote 33 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 2Against 60Abst. 2No vote 16 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 65Abst. 14No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 19Against 4Abst. 4No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium010
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain001
Finland010
France020
Greece001
Croatia010
Italy0170
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland2170
Romania050
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 11 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment378 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 509 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote400 for, 148 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.89 508 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 1 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment428 for, 186 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 559 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.87 475 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 516 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 163 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renew, Greensr · shared0.87 519 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.86 519 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 502 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 543 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 503 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172891
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 6 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights”. Vote, 13 March 2025. votingId 172891, reference 2024/2829(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172891 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-13-172891,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 6 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172891}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172891},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172891, reference 2024/2829(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}