Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 4

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 4
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 13 Mar 2025
Result
258 for · 284 against · 83 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 March 2025, 12:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
B10-0143/2025 – § 5/4
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0143
Dossier
2024/2829(RSP)
Vote id
172889
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 258 for, 284 against, 83 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 41 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “or activities to disrupt or weaken collective bargaining or trade union organisations, such as union busting”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 8Against 51Abst. 8No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
EPPFor 1Against 151Abst. 5No vote 31 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 18Against 46Abst. 1No vote 15 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.56
PatriotsFor 1Against 14Abst. 62No vote 9 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.71
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 4No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 21Against 3Abst. 3No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium130
Bulgaria030
Germany070
Denmark220
Estonia110
Spain010
Finland030
France190
Ireland320
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden020
Slovenia002
Slovakia006

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 625 members

No vote recorded, 94

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 94 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 564 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 538 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.85 358 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 568 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 582 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after recital F Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment217 for, 319 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 495 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital W 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment255 for, 252 against, 132 abstained Adopted For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 558 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 80, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment252 for, 381 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 588 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 418 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 421 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172889
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 4 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights”. Vote, 13 March 2025. votingId 172889, reference 2024/2829(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172889 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-13-172889,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 4 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172889}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172889},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172889, reference 2024/2829(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}