Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 1

Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 13 Mar 2025
Result
404 for · 204 against · 15 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 March 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
B10-0143/2025 – § 5/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0143
Dossier
2024/2829(RSP)
Vote id
172886
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 404 for, 204 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Urges the Commission in the context of the forthcoming revision of the European Public Procurement Directive to further promote collective bargaining and the use of the social clause, and preferential treatment for companies whose workers are covered by collective agreements;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 38Against 26Abst. 1No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
EPPFor 117Against 36Abst. 2No vote 33 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
ECRFor 18Against 44Abst. 1No vote 17 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.55
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 1No vote 8 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 6No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 20Against 3Abst. 4No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 623 members

No vote recorded, 96

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 96 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 571 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7 — part 4 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment451 for, 197 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.76 561 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 22 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote377 for, 166 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 507 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote469 for, 136 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.75 570 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7 — part 2 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment450 for, 196 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 557 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.74 572 voters
21 May 2026Recital A — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote303 for, 178 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.74 445 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 10 — part 1 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment418 for, 180 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 555 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsFinal332 for, 209 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 58 %r · shared0.73 502 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 123 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote373 for, 248 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.73 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172886
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 1 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights”. Vote, 13 March 2025. votingId 172886, reference 2024/2829(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172886 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-13-172886,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 1 — Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172886}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-13/172886},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172886, reference 2024/2829(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}