Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 3

Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 3
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
428 for · 195 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 18 of 80 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5/3
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0156
Dossier
2025/2528(RSP)
Vote id
172604
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 428 for, 195 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “The words ‘in light of this change’; ‘now’; ‘as the largest donor to Ukraine’ and ‘to replace suspended USAID funding,’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 16Against 1Abst. 26No vote 3 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.41
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 4Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 157Against 5Abst. 6No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 4Against 62Abst. 6No vote 8 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
PatriotsFor 0Against 83Abst. 0No vote 3 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 1Against 17Abst. 8No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 670 members

No vote recorded, 49

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 49 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the UnionFinal378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 542 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 117 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment386 for, 174 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 535 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.93 497 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 616 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.92 609 voters
22 Oct 2024Paragraph 16 — part 2 2022 discharge: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilSplit vote417 for, 204 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 617 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.92 549 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.91 595 voters
22 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 14 2022 discharge: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilSeparate vote429 for, 206 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 620 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.91 576 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172604
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 3 — Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172604, reference 2025/2528(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172604 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172604,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 3 — Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172604}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172604},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172604, reference 2025/2528(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}