Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 2

Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
494 for · 88 against · 92 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:34
More facts (6)
Position
vote 17 of 80 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR
Official label
RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0156
Dossier
2025/2528(RSP)
Vote id
172603
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 494 for, 88 against, 92 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘stresses that, in light of this change, the EU and its Member States are now Ukraine’s primary strategic allies and must maintain their role as the largest donor to Ukraine and significantly increase the much-needed assistance they provide to uphold Ukraine’s right to self-defence and step in, as far as possible, to replace suspended USAID funding, while ensuring long-term aid for reconstruction and recovery;’ without the words: ‘in light of this change’; ‘now’; ‘as the largest donor to Ukraine’ and ‘to replace suspended USAID funding,’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 17Against 1Abst. 23No vote 5 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 131Against 3Abst. 0No vote 2 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 163Against 4Abst. 3No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 35Against 32Abst. 5No vote 8 of 80Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
PatriotsFor 8Against 28Abst. 47No vote 3 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ESNFor 17Against 2Abst. 5No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.56
No groupFor 1Against 18Abst. 9No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia001
Germany1200
France001
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Poland003
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 674 members

No vote recorded, 45

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 45 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.73 510 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote417 for, 177 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.72 600 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote426 for, 172 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.71 612 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 33 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsSeparate vote460 for, 164 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 600 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 30 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment428 for, 164 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.71 613 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 27 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote417 for, 192 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.70 609 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote472 for, 130 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.70 600 voters
24 Feb 2026Paragraph 23 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineSplit vote404 for, 131 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.69 566 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 2 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote443 for, 171 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 609 voters
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorFinal418 for, 152 against, 85 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.69 607 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172603
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172603, reference 2025/2528(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172603 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172603,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172603}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172603},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172603, reference 2025/2528(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}