Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 24 to recital N

The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria

Vote
Amendment 24 to recital N
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
182 for · 455 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:25
More facts (6)
Position
vote 52 of 63 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC–B10–0157/2025 – recital N – Am 24
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0164
Dossier
2025/2569(RSP)
Vote id
172582
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 182 for, 455 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 3Against 159Abst. 8No vote 18 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 4No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 80Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 12Against 4Abst. 10No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium050
Bulgaria030
Germany060
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland040
Lithuania020
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 605 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.98 409 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 607 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment192 for, 450 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 605 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment187 for, 437 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.98 587 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment187 for, 450 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 604 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment191 for, 472 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 621 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 406 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.97 425 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment179 for, 396 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 531 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172582
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 24 to recital N — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172582, reference 2025/2569(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172582 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172582,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 24 to recital N — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172582}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172582},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172582, reference 2025/2569(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}