Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 30, after paragraph 7

The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria

Vote
Amendment 30, after paragraph 7
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
213 for · 436 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 13:20
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 63 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
RC–B10–0157/2025 – After § 7 – Am 30
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0164
Dossier
2025/2569(RSP)
Vote id
172543
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 213 for, 436 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 2No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 126Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 21Against 148Abst. 2No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 6No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France080
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 660 members

No vote recorded, 59

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 59 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.96 598 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital B Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment200 for, 382 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 535 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3, adding text after recital C Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeAmendment197 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 533 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 554 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 550 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 546 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 557 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.95 586 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 425 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 556 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 1, adding text after citation 13 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment183 for, 421 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 554 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172543
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 30, after paragraph 7 — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172543, reference 2025/2569(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172543 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172543,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 30, after paragraph 7 — The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in Syria}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172543}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172543},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172543, reference 2025/2569(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}