Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 29 — part 2

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025

Vote
Paragraph 29 — part 2
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
334 for · 247 against · 98 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 83 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10–0023/2025 – Maravillas Abadía Jover – § 29/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0023
Dossier
2024/2084(INI)
Vote id
172268
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 334 for, 247 against, 98 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘recalls, in this regard, as the rate of self-employed professionals in the cultural and creative sectors is more than double that in the general population, the 13 initiatives laid down in the Commission’s 21 February 2024 response to the European Parliament resolution of 21 November 2023 on an EU framework for the social and professional situation of artists and workers in the cultural and creative sectors and calls on the Commission to start implementing them in cooperation with the Member States;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 133Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 55Against 16Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
EPPFor 22Against 146Abst. 8No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
ECRFor 6Against 17Abst. 49No vote 8 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.52
PatriotsFor 8Against 42Abst. 31No vote 5 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 16Against 5Abst. 7No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany070
Denmark220
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1200
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Latvia100
Netherlands340
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden030
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 64 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 317 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 541 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote247 for, 291 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.84 542 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.83 541 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 558 voters
27 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 14 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Separate vote258 for, 321 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 568 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 3 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSeparate vote253 for, 321 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Greensr · shared0.82 541 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.82 615 voters
17 Jun 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 40 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleAmendment296 for, 339 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 631 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172268
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 29 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172268, reference 2024/2084(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172268 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172268,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 29 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172268}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172268},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172268, reference 2024/2084(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}