Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 17 — part 2

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025

Vote
Paragraph 17 — part 2
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
452 for · 194 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 29 of 83 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10–0023/2025 – Maravillas Abadía Jover – § 17/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0023
Dossier
2024/2084(INI)
Vote id
172248
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 452 for, 194 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “non-EU born individuals, LGBTI”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 131Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 148Against 10Abst. 10No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 0Against 65Abst. 5No vote 10 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 0Against 83Abst. 0No vote 3 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 12Abst. 4No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France1200
Greece300
Croatia300
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy2100
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania801
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.95 589 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 593 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote429 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 596 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote419 for, 180 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 589 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote421 for, 178 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 591 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 539 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 589 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote382 for, 159 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.93 532 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote384 for, 158 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D, Renew, Greensr · shared0.93 535 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172248
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 17 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172248, reference 2024/2084(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172248 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172248,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 17 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172248}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172248},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172248, reference 2024/2084(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}