Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 35 — part 2

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025

Vote
Paragraph 35 — part 2
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
501 for · 164 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 26 of 39 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 35/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0022
Dossier
2024/2112(INI)
Vote id
172196
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 501 for, 164 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 74 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “believes that this framework, where appropriate, should be strengthened by EU-level investment instruments and tools designed to minimise the cost for EU taxpayers and maximise efficiency in the provision of European public goods;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 34Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 50Against 1Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 128Against 3Abst. 2No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 171Against 3Abst. 3No vote 11 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 58Against 7Abst. 6No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 0Against 82Abst. 0No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 10Abst. 2No vote 3 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0120
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIFinal441 for, 173 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.85 647 voters
3 Apr 2025Final vote — text as a whole Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentFinal432 for, 127 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.85 581 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 42 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote476 for, 104 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 611 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 88 The European Water Resilience StrategySeparate vote460 for, 165 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 609 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceFinal475 for, 136 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.84 629 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesFinal492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.84 624 voters
22 Oct 2025Separate vote on recital D Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSeparate vote464 for, 136 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.84 607 voters
9 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 9 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSeparate vote490 for, 114 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.84 628 voters
18 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaFinal456 for, 118 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.84 593 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 612 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172196
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 35 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172196, reference 2024/2112(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172196 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172196,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 35 — part 2 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172196}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172196},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172196, reference 2024/2112(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}