Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 1
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
525 for · 129 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 39 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10–0022/2025 – Fernando Navarrete Rojas – § 10/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0022
Dossier
2024/2112(INI)
Vote id
172179
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 525 for, 129 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Highlights the need to create fiscal buffers to address fiscal sustainability challenges, ensuring sufficient resources for investment and for dealing with potential future shocks and crises;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 6No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 130Against 2Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 169Against 4Abst. 1No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 8Against 62Abst. 1No vote 9 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 64Against 11Abst. 7No vote 4 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
ESNFor 21Against 2Abst. 1No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 15Against 10Abst. 3No vote 1 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany700
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1200
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 673 members

No vote recorded, 46

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 46 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 96 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment464 for, 172 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 603 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.69 582 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Reduced US military deployment in Europe Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in EuropeOther342 for, 65 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 76 %r · shared0.69 425 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 74 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote403 for, 190 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.66 611 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 102 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment414 for, 215 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.65 601 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 13 — part 2 World Cancer DaySplit vote444 for, 69 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.64 497 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.63 538 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.63 545 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 122 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment378 for, 191 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.63 539 voters
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Banking Union – annual report 2025Split vote380 for, 154 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.63 532 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172179
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172179, reference 2024/2112(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172179 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172179,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172179}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172179},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172179, reference 2024/2112(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}