Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2, after paragraph 51

Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme

Vote
Amendment 2, after paragraph 51
Result
191 for · 450 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 March 2025, 13:03
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 5 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members
Official label
A10-0021/2025 – Christian Ehler – After § 51 – Am 2
Vote id
172133
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 191 for, 450 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 10Against 154Abst. 5No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 10No vote 6 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 83Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 4Abst. 11No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium003
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Czechia300
Denmark100
Estonia001
Spain200
Finland100
France400
Greece100
Croatia100
Italy2200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia300
Netherlands100
Poland1702
Romania104
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 667 members

No vote recorded, 52

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 52 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.96 428 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 14, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment180 for, 403 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 552 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 1 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment182 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 563 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 562 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 25 to recital P The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment197 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 636 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/001 BE/BelGaN – BelgiumAmendment200 for, 420 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 588 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment200 for, 411 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 574 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 581 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 557 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 566 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 2, after paragraph 51 — Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme”. Vote, 11 March 2025. votingId 172133, reference 2024/2109(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172133 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-11-172133,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2, after paragraph 51 — Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172133}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-11/172133},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172133, reference 2024/2109(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}