Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 32 — part 2

European Central Bank – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 32 — part 2
Result
494 for · 87 against · 45 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 February 2025, 12:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 39 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · split vote: Greens
Official label
A10–0003/2025 – Anouk Van Brug – § 32/2
Vote id
171749
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘notes that the supportive nature of the ECB’s secondary objectives complements the primary mandate; according to the Treaties, the EU’s aim is to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples, create balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 1Abst. 1No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 49Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 108Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 59Against 8Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 58Against 9Abst. 3No vote 10 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 0Against 42Abst. 36No vote 8 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 2No vote 5 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 14Against 7Abst. 3No vote 5 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark300
Spain310
Finland200
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 626 members

No vote recorded, 93

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 93 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 63 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote553 for, 82 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 85 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.87 566 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 499 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote478 for, 69 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.86 547 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 587 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 13 — part 1 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentSplit vote479 for, 68 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 544 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 568 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 516 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote470 for, 64 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 515 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal513 for, 119 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.83 570 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 48 — part 4 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote485 for, 106 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 528 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 32 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024”. Vote, 11 February 2025. votingId 171749, reference 2024/2054(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171749 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-02-11-171749,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 32 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171749}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171749},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171749, reference 2024/2054(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}