Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 27 — part 1

European Central Bank – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 27 — part 1
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 11 Feb 2025
Result
532 for · 60 against · 44 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 February 2025, 12:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, ECR · split vote: EPP · separate vote: Patriots
Official label
A10–0003/2025 – Anouk Van Brug – § 27/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0003
Dossier
2024/2054(INI)
Vote id
171744
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 532 for, 60 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 84 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Considers that the digital euro will only become a success story if it provides tangible added value for European citizens that they can understand; notes that currently many European citizens either have not heard about the digital euro project or remain sceptical;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 12Against 2Abst. 29No vote 3 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.51
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 7No vote 25 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 164Against 2Abst. 0No vote 22 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 58Against 12Abst. 3No vote 7 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.69
PatriotsFor 71Against 7Abst. 0No vote 8 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 1No vote 6 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 18Abst. 4No vote 4 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Cyprus100
Germany200
Denmark001
Spain003
Finland003
France108
Greece400
Ireland201
Italy217
Netherlands010
Portugal002
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 636 members

No vote recorded, 83

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 83 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171744
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 27 — part 1 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024”. Vote, 11 February 2025. votingId 171744, reference 2024/2054(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171744 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-02-11-171744,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 27 — part 1 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171744}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171744},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171744, reference 2024/2054(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}