Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 23 — part 2

European Central Bank – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 23 — part 2
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 11 Feb 2025
Result
545 for · 70 against · 22 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 February 2025, 12:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 24 of 60 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, Patriots · split vote: Greens, Patriots
Official label
A10–0003/2025 – Anouk Van Brug – § 23/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0003
Dossier
2024/2054(INI)
Vote id
171734
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 545 for, 70 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 86 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “applicable only during crisis periods that, if not carefully implemented, risk”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 52Against 0Abst. 0No vote 1 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 67Against 2Abst. 5No vote 6 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 34Against 38Abst. 7No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.22
ESNFor 1Against 17Abst. 2No vote 6 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
No groupFor 5Against 10Abst. 8No vote 6 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia001
Germany0100
France010
Hungary001
Lithuania100
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 82

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 82 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 7 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote484 for, 74 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 549 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 6 — part 2 Case of Ahmadreza Djalali in IranSplit vote411 for, 51 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 429 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote478 for, 68 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.77 519 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 1 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote456 for, 68 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.74 508 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 4 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote428 for, 76 against, 103 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.74 549 voters
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 45 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsSplit vote514 for, 83 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.72 573 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Addressing transnational repression of human rights defendersFinal512 for, 76 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.71 564 voters
26 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the ArcticFinal510 for, 75 against, 80 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.71 588 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSplit vote474 for, 73 against, 91 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.71 567 voters
27 Nov 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Draft amending budget No 5/2024: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updatesFinal525 for, 75 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.70 606 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171734
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 23 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024”. Vote, 11 February 2025. votingId 171734, reference 2024/2054(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171734 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-02-11-171734,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 23 — part 2 — European Central Bank – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171734}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-11/171734},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171734, reference 2024/2054(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}