Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 10 Feb 2025
Result
99 for · 317 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 February 2025, 17:16
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group
Vote id
171785
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 99 for, 317 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 23 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 28Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 75Abst. 1No vote 59 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 0Against 47Abst. 0No vote 28 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 112Abst. 4No vote 72 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 20Against 3Abst. 14No vote 43 of 80Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
PatriotsFor 58Against 0Abst. 0No vote 28 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 11Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 9Against 4Abst. 3No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany020
Denmark010
Finland010
France070
Greece030
Italy070
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 438 members

No vote recorded, 281

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 281 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.96 348 voters
14 Nov 2024Amendment 10 to paragraph 1 UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Amendment143 for, 458 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 407 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 51, adding text after recital L — part 1 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment159 for, 452 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESN, EPPr · shared0.96 398 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 37 to paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment151 for, 468 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.96 409 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment154 for, 450 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 400 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 60 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment166 for, 444 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots, ESN, EPPr · shared0.95 390 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.95 331 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment152 for, 444 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.95 396 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.95 340 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment150 for, 452 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 400 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-10/171785
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group”. Vote, 10 February 2025. votingId 171785. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-10/171785 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 February 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-02-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-02-10-171785,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-10/171785}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-02-10/171785},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171785. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-02-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-02-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}