Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 5

Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 5
Result
424 for · 143 against · 46 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 January 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR · separate vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0074/2025 - § 10/5
Vote id
171615
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 424 for, 143 against, 46 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls on the Commission and the Member States to strictly enforce the Digital Services Act”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 1Abst. 2No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 149Against 5Abst. 8No vote 26 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 1Against 63Abst. 2No vote 14 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 35Abst. 29No vote 22 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 0Against 18Abst. 4No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria200
Germany800
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1100
Ireland600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 508 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.93 540 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.92 554 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.92 534 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 546 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.92 565 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 508 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote457 for, 153 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 549 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 506 voters
14 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Final429 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.91 551 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 5 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine”. Vote, 23 January 2025. votingId 171615, reference 2024/2988(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171615 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-01-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-01-23-171615,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 5 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-01-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171615}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171615},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171615, reference 2024/2988(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}