Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 4

Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 4
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 23 Jan 2025
Result
428 for · 76 against · 103 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 January 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR · separate vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0074/2025 - § 10/4
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0074
Dossier
2024/2988(RSP)
Vote id
171614
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 428 for, 76 against, 103 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘and how this will further enable Russia’s disinformation campaign around the world;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 1Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 1Abst. 0No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 68Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 151Against 5Abst. 7No vote 25 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 6Against 6Abst. 54No vote 14 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.73
PatriotsFor 0Against 29Abst. 34No vote 23 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.31
ESNFor 0Against 18Abst. 3No vote 5 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
No groupFor 2Against 16Abst. 4No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Czechia020
Germany162
Greece021
Poland010
Romania011
Slovakia040

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 501 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 4 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanSplit vote405 for, 68 against, 115 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.87 505 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.87 535 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentFinal441 for, 131 against, 81 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.86 551 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.86 559 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.86 556 voters
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedSeparate vote462 for, 128 against, 82 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 565 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedFinal415 for, 193 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.85 545 voters
22 Oct 2024Final vote — text as a whole 2022 discharge: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal431 for, 131 against, 83 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.85 549 voters
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilFinal441 for, 125 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.85 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171614
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 4 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine”. Vote, 23 January 2025. votingId 171614, reference 2024/2988(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171614 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-01-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-01-23-171614,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 4 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-01-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171614}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171614},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171614, reference 2024/2988(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}