Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 2

Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 2
Result
419 for · 172 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 January 2025, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR · separate vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0074/2025 - § 10/2
Vote id
171612
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “on fact-checking”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 141Against 10Abst. 14No vote 23 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 3Against 63Abst. 0No vote 14 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 22 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 0Against 14Abst. 7No vote 8 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0110
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 614 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 548 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 508 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote429 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 550 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 545 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.93 542 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 508 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 565 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 3 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 547 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote419 for, 180 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.93 542 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote452 for, 194 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 575 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine”. Vote, 23 January 2025. votingId 171612, reference 2024/2988(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171612 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-01-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-01-23-171612,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 2 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-01-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171612}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171612},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171612, reference 2024/2988(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}