Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 10 — part 1

Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine

Vote
Paragraph 10 — part 1
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 23 Jan 2025
Result
415 for · 164 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 January 2025, 12:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: ECR · separate vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0074/2025 - § 10/1
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0074
Dossier
2024/2988(RSP)
Vote id
171611
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Expresses deep concern about the recent announcements from social media companies’ leadership concerning relaxing their rules’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 141Against 6Abst. 17No vote 24 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 0Against 62Abst. 4No vote 14 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 23 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 2Against 12Abst. 8No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Czechia050
Denmark010
Spain050
France0290
Italy060
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 108

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 108 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.96 538 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 544 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 505 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regimeFinal386 for, 184 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.95 506 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote419 for, 180 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 539 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.94 532 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 541 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote452 for, 194 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.94 572 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BP Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote429 for, 188 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 547 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.94 543 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171611
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine”. Vote, 23 January 2025. votingId 171611, reference 2024/2988(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171611 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-01-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-01-23-171611,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 10 — part 1 — Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against Ukraine}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-01-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171611}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171611},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171611, reference 2024/2988(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}