Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 to paragraph 5

Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria

Vote
Amendment 5 to paragraph 5
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 23 Jan 2025
Result
56 for · 546 against · 10 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 January 2025, 12:10
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 15 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0087/2025 - § 5 - Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0091
Dossier
2025/2512(RSP)
Vote id
171589
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 56 for, 546 against, 10 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 9 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 2Against 44Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 4No vote 18 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 163Abst. 1No vote 24 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 14 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 22 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 2No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 3No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France030
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy0200
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0180
Romania040
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 107

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 107 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 7 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171589
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 — Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria”. Vote, 23 January 2025. votingId 171589, reference 2025/2512(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171589 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 January 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-01-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-01-23-171589,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 to paragraph 5 — Case of Boualem Sansal in Algeria}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-01-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171589}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-01-23/171589},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171589, reference 2025/2512(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-01-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-01-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}