Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 19 Dec 2024
Result
424 for · 141 against · 1 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, Patriots, ECR · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ae/1
Text
Report A-10-2024-0030
Dossier
2024/2057(INI)
Vote id
171323
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 424 for, 141 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 75 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘safe and regular migration pathways, and’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 3Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 60Against 4Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 127Against 6Abst. 0No vote 55 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 2Against 60Abst. 0No vote 18 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 8Against 60Abst. 0No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 19Against 3Abst. 0No vote 3 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 16Against 5Abst. 1No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia400
Germany2600
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1600
Finland200
France030
Greece300
Croatia210
Ireland400
Italy600
Lithuania100
Luxembourg200
Malta100
Netherlands600
Poland1900
Portugal500
Romania610
Sweden410
Slovenia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 566 members

No vote recorded, 153

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 153 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 22 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote463 for, 162 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 518 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 20 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote432 for, 145 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 495 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 20 to Annex, guideline 6, paragraph 3 — part 2 Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member StatesAmendment424 for, 192 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.82 493 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.81 505 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 74 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote397 for, 170 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.81 486 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote450 for, 171 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.80 505 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.80 535 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialSplit vote467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.80 527 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.80 332 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.80 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171323
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171323, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171323 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171323,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171323}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171323},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171323, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}