Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point w — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point w — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 19 Dec 2024
Result
355 for · 177 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew, Greens, The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2
Text
Report A-10-2024-0030
Dossier
2024/2057(INI)
Vote id
171321
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 355 for, 177 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘through a gender-responsive and intersectional approach, both in terms of GAP III’s geographical coverage and areas of action, as well as gender mainstreaming in all areas of external action, whether trade, development policy, migration, humanitarian aid, security or sectors such as energy, fisheries and agriculture, while enhancing the consistency between the EU’s internal and external policies;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 109Against 0Abst. 1No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 60Against 3Abst. 0No vote 14 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 96Against 17Abst. 20No vote 55 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.58
ECRFor 1Against 59Abst. 0No vote 20 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
PatriotsFor 0Against 60Abst. 7No vote 19 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 16Abst. 1No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden200
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 561 members

No vote recorded, 158

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 158 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 3 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 169 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 499 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote413 for, 189 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 503 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote419 for, 172 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 22 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaSplit vote436 for, 208 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 536 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 468 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BJ — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote410 for, 190 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.90 499 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote416 for, 170 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 485 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.90 442 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 78 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote396 for, 182 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 482 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote415 for, 164 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 497 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171321
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171321, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171321 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171321,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171321}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171321},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171321, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}