Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point u — part 2

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point u — part 2
Result
276 for · 287 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew, Greens · split vote: EPP, ECR
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/2
Vote id
171315
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 276 for, 287 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “feminist”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 0Abst. 0No vote 25 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 11Against 123Abst. 1No vote 53 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 1Against 62Abst. 0No vote 17 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 5Against 14Abst. 3No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria300
Germany700
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France900
Ireland400
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 568 members

No vote recorded, 151

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 151 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.94 499 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote299 for, 354 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 518 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 10 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment252 for, 305 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 469 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment283 for, 358 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 521 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 13 to paragraph 123 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment275 for, 374 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 522 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment278 for, 349 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 522 voters
18 Jun 2026Paragraph 14 — part 2 Recruitment of children by organised crimeSplit vote262 for, 291 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 460 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote277 for, 342 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.92 498 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 514 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 480 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171315, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171315 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171315,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171315}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171315},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171315, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}