Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 1, point q — part 1

Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Vote
Paragraph 1, point q — part 1
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 19 Dec 2024
Result
400 for · 148 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 December 2024, 12:13
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 46 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Renew, Greens · split vote: EPP, Patriots
Official label
A10–0030/2024 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1
Text
Report A-10-2024-0030
Dossier
2024/2057(INI)
Vote id
171305
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 400 for, 148 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights’ and ‘emphasise that anti-gender movements are not only attacking women’s rights and gender equality but go hand-in-hand with anti-democratic movements;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 112Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 63Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 120Against 3Abst. 13No vote 52 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 3Against 57Abst. 2No vote 18 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 62Abst. 6No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 1No vote 4 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 1No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany190
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania010
Poland030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 571 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Final vote Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicalsFinal486 for, 171 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.93 540 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 503 voters
1 Apr 2025Final vote Common data platform on chemicals, establishing a monitoring and outlook framework for chemicalsFinal481 for, 170 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.92 538 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 495 voters
9 Oct 2025Recital D — part 2 Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in CabaretSplit vote434 for, 161 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 496 voters
14 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Final429 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.91 512 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 496 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.91 523 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 33 — part 6 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote428 for, 151 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 72 %r · shared0.91 477 voters
7 Jul 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther308 for, 101 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 75 %r · shared0.91 338 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171305
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women”. Vote, 19 December 2024. votingId 171305, reference 2024/2057(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171305 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-19-171305,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 — Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171305}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-19/171305},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171305, reference 2024/2057(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}