Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 4, point 4, point 3

Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committees

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 4, point 4, point 3
Result
169 for · 479 against · 4 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
18 December 2024, 12:14
More facts (6)
Position
vote 13 of 17 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0215/2024 – § 4, point 4, point 3 – Am 16
Vote id
171292
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 169 for, 479 against, 4 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 40Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 124Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 3 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 166Abst. 0No vote 21 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 53Against 17Abst. 1No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.62
PatriotsFor 76Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 9Abst. 3No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium010
Czechia010
Germany0150
Denmark030
Spain030
Finland010
France050
Croatia010
Italy030
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.94 417 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningAmendment164 for, 461 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 586 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.92 429 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.92 402 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.92 394 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 15 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment174 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 559 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment174 for, 446 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECR, S&Dr · shared0.92 591 voters
22 Oct 2024Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 Draft amending budget No 4/2024: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to some decentralised agenciesAmendment193 for, 455 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 606 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 25 to Article 1, alinéa 1, après le point 24 Règlement (UE) 2023/956 après l'article 32 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment158 for, 411 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 541 voters
25 Nov 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedAmendment184 for, 450 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 4, point 4, point 3 — Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committees”. Vote, 18 December 2024. votingId 171292, reference 2024/2115(RSO). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-18/171292 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 December 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-12-18/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-12-18-171292,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 4, point 4, point 3 — Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committees}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-12-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-18/171292}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-12-18/171292},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 171292, reference 2024/2115(RSO). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-12-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-12-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}