Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Nov 2024
Result
152 for · 378 against · 26 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:34
More facts (7)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 40 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0173/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0173
Dossier
2024/2911(RSP)
Vote id
170765
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 152 for, 378 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 27 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 25Against 6Abst. 1No vote 14 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.67
GreensFor 2Against 47Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 0Against 107Abst. 1No vote 28 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 23Against 28Abst. 8No vote 18 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
EPPFor 87Against 41Abst. 8No vote 52 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ECRFor 3Against 56Abst. 3No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 4Against 59Abst. 1No vote 22 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 2No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 7Against 14Abst. 2No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium002
Bulgaria010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia001
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Italy0160
Lithuania110
Luxembourg010
Latvia020
Netherlands100
Poland0180
Romania140
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 556 members

No vote recorded, 163

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 163 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 45 to Article 2 — part 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment253 for, 379 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.51 504 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 82 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment248 for, 378 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.50 498 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170765
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Final vote on the whole text — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments”. Vote, 28 November 2024. votingId 170765, reference 2024/2911(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170765 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-11-28-170765,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170765}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170765},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170765, reference 2024/2911(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}