Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 2

Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 2
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Nov 2024
Result
194 for · 348 against · 31 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0173/2024 – § 6/2
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0173
Dossier
2024/2911(RSP)
Vote id
170743
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 194 for, 348 against, 31 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 18Against 9Abst. 6No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 2No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 67Against 33Abst. 9No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.42
RenewFor 39Against 19Abst. 2No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
EPPFor 8Against 133Abst. 4No vote 43 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ECRFor 6Against 52Abst. 4No vote 16 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 7Against 61Abst. 1No vote 17 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 1No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 2Against 19Abst. 2No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium020
Czechia170
Denmark010
Spain060
France0280
Hungary600
Italy031
Latvia010
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

No vote recorded, 146

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 146 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 46 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment251 for, 309 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.72 475 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.70 477 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 42 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote290 for, 357 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.70 530 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 484 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 24 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote278 for, 371 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.69 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 207 + 266 + 348 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment251 for, 378 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.69 516 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 65 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote253 for, 320 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 477 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 489 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.69 489 voters
17 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleFinal282 for, 340 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.69 517 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170743
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments”. Vote, 28 November 2024. votingId 170743, reference 2024/2911(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170743 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-11-28-170743,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 2 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170743}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170743},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170743, reference 2024/2911(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}