Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 6 — part 1

Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments

Vote
Paragraph 6 — part 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 28 Nov 2024
Result
368 for · 133 against · 64 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
28 November 2024, 12:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: EPP
Official label
RC-B10-0173/2024 – § 6/1
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0173
Dossier
2024/2911(RSP)
Vote id
170742
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 368 for, 133 against, 64 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘restaurants and cafés’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 20Against 1Abst. 13No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
GreensFor 42Against 5Abst. 3No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
S&DFor 108Against 1Abst. 1No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 44Against 13Abst. 3No vote 17 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.60
EPPFor 136Against 1Abst. 4No vote 47 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 7Against 45Abst. 5No vote 21 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
PatriotsFor 7Against 33Abst. 28No vote 18 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.23
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 2No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 3Against 14Abst. 5No vote 8 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany170
Spain010
Greece020
Poland010
Romania001
Slovakia114

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 565 members

No vote recorded, 154

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 154 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.78 503 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 10 — part 5 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineSplit vote424 for, 143 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.78 498 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 55 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSeparate vote378 for, 127 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 475 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleFinal395 for, 136 against, 80 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.77 492 voters
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 54 — part 2 Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in UzbekistanSplit vote374 for, 122 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 472 voters
14 Nov 2024Separate vote on paragraph 95 UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Separate vote424 for, 195 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 513 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 21 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 163 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renew, Greensr · shared0.77 482 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 476 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Banking Union – annual report 2025Final376 for, 187 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.77 471 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionFinal418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.77 505 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170742
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 6 — part 1 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments”. Vote, 28 November 2024. votingId 170742, reference 2024/2911(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170742 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 28 November 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-11-28/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-11-28-170742,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 6 — part 1 — Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-28},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170742}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-11-28/170742},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170742, reference 2024/2911(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-11-28-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-11-28 (CC BY 4.0)}
}