Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 to paragraph 92

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 16 to paragraph 92
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2024
Result
255 for · 314 against · 80 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2024, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 148 of 152 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 92 – Am 16
Text
Report A-10-2024-0008
Dossier
2024/0176(BUD)
Vote id
170212
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 255 for, 314 against, 80 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 13Against 0Abst. 36No vote 4 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.60
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 15Against 50Abst. 3No vote 9 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.60
EPPFor 1Against 167Abst. 3No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 2Against 61Abst. 7No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
PatriotsFor 34Against 19Abst. 26No vote 7 of 86Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.15
ESNFor 4Against 15Abst. 0No vote 6 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
No groupFor 20Against 2Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Czechia200
Germany800
Spain003
Greece400
Poland001
Romania011
Slovakia610

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment238 for, 315 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 502 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 587 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 Public procurementAmendment280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.84 586 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 563 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment215 for, 313 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 504 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 590 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment248 for, 279 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 503 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment198 for, 383 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 576 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineAmendment191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 571 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 14, adding text after recital F Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment217 for, 319 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170212
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections”. Vote, 23 October 2024. votingId 170212, reference 2024/0176(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170212 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-23-170212,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170212}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170212},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170212, reference 2024/0176(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}