Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 68 — part 4, after paragraph 91

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 68 — part 4, after paragraph 91
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2024
Result
216 for · 389 against · 39 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2024, 13:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 147 of 152 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: S&D, Greens
Official label
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/4
Text
Report A-10-2024-0008
Dossier
2024/0176(BUD)
Vote id
170211
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 216 for, 389 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and to take the necessary steps to allow for the crèche staff to be directly employed by Parliament;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 44Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 20Against 0Abst. 28No vote 5 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
S&DFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 7Against 62Abst. 1No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 0Against 168Abst. 1No vote 19 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 1No vote 9 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 5Against 71Abst. 1No vote 9 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 3Against 16Abst. 0No vote 6 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia030
Denmark001
Estonia010
France020
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0230
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0180
Romania040
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 644 members

No vote recorded, 75

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 75 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 53 to paragraph 15 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment205 for, 395 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 602 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 585 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 600 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 608 voters
21 Jan 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment228 for, 409 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 586 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 65 — part 1 of 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Split vote237 for, 416 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 594 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 584 voters
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Freedom Flotilla Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Freedom FlotillaOther164 for, 256 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 38 %r · shared0.89 396 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 582 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170211
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 68 — part 4, after paragraph 91 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections”. Vote, 23 October 2024. votingId 170211, reference 2024/0176(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170211 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-23-170211,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 68 — part 4, after paragraph 91 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170211}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170211},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170211, reference 2024/0176(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}