Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 21 — part 1, after paragraph 27

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 21 — part 1, after paragraph 27
Result
192 for · 437 against · 23 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2024, 13:24
More facts (6)
Position
vote 28 of 152 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, EPP · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 27 – Am 21/1
Vote id
170077
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 192 for, 437 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Condemns’, ‘which’, ‘inexplicable and devastating’, ‘highlights in that regard, that the use and accountability of Union funds has been transparent for decades at Hungarian universities;’ and ‘calls on the Commission to immediately withdraw its discriminative decision;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 6No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 121Abst. 1No vote 13 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 19Against 147Abst. 4No vote 18 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 63Against 0Abst. 8No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 75Against 3Abst. 1No vote 7 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 9Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Cyprus020
Czechia040
Germany0300
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain1170
Finland040
France600
Greece070
Croatia041
Hungary600
Ireland040
Italy090
Lithuania030
Luxembourg020
Latvia020
Malta020
Netherlands042
Poland0210
Portugal060
Romania240
Sweden050
Slovenia410
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 652 members

No vote recorded, 67

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 67 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAmendment179 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 524 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 584 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 585 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 603 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 163, adding text after paragraph 56 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment196 for, 426 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECR, S&D, Greensr · shared0.94 569 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment194 for, 408 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 559 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 19 — part 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment179 for, 375 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriots, ESNr · shared0.93 512 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Amendment181 for, 380 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 519 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.93 574 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 3 to recital B Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment195 for, 394 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 552 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 21 — part 1, after paragraph 27 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections”. Vote, 23 October 2024. votingId 170077, reference 2024/0176(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170077 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-23-170077,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 21 — part 1, after paragraph 27 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170077}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170077},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170077, reference 2024/0176(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}