Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15

Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States

Vote
Amendment 15
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2024
Result
263 for · 356 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2024, 13:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 12 of 19 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D · separate vote: ECR, EPP
Official label
A10–0004/2024 – Li Andersson – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 15
Text
Report A-10-2024-0004
Dossier
2024/0599(NLE)
Vote id
170023
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 263 for, 356 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 6Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 1Abst. 0No vote 21 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 39Against 25Abst. 2No vote 11 of 77Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.39
EPPFor 9Against 153Abst. 2No vote 24 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 3No vote 8 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 9 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 0No vote 5 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 16Against 8Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria040
Belgium030
Czechia080
Spain060
France0290
Greece010
Hungary0100
Italy070
Latvia010
Netherlands040
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 628 members

No vote recorded, 91

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 91 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote246 for, 318 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 502 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 17 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026Split vote282 for, 335 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 546 voters
17 Dec 2025Annex, paragraph 1 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote278 for, 374 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 42 %r · shared0.90 575 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 27 — part 3 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote279 for, 368 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.89 572 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote312 for, 359 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 595 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote250 for, 310 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 502 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 31 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote311 for, 367 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 597 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote317 for, 352 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 593 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 19 — part 2 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote258 for, 290 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 503 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on paragraph 16 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySeparate vote245 for, 332 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.87 507 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170023
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 15 — Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States”. Vote, 23 October 2024. votingId 170023, reference 2024/0599(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170023 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-23-170023,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15 — Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170023}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170023},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170023, reference 2024/0599(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}