Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 21 Oct 2024
Result
164 for · 319 against · 1 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 October 2024, 18:27
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group
Vote id
170005
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 164 for, 319 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 34 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 77Against 3Abst. 1No vote 55 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 3Against 50Abst. 0No vote 24 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 0Against 121Abst. 0No vote 67 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 55Abst. 0No vote 23 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 23 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 12Abst. 0No vote 13 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 0No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Germany150
Spain020
Greece300
Poland010
Romania020
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 484 members

No vote recorded, 235

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 235 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 215 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment211 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 437 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 435 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 208 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment207 for, 430 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 437 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.96 439 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment182 for, 362 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.95 377 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 210 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 425 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 438 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 434 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 194 + 273 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 421 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.95 441 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 212 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment209 for, 422 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.95 434 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 52 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment216 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 437 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170005
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group”. Vote, 21 October 2024. votingId 170005. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170005 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-21-170005,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170005}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170005},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170005. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}