Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 10 Oct 2024
Result
540 for · 23 against · 47 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 October 2024, 13:23
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 3 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
B10-0101/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0118
Dossier
2024/2857(RSP)
Vote id
169857
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 540 for, 23 against, 47 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 89 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 24Against 1Abst. 10No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.53
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 111Against 1Abst. 0No vote 24 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 156Against 0Abst. 1No vote 31 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 4No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 52Against 0Abst. 11No vote 23 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
ESNFor 1Against 2Abst. 19No vote 3 of 25Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 6Against 19Abst. 2No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland200
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Romania100
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 610 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169857
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Final vote on the whole text — The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas”. Vote, 10 October 2024. votingId 169857, reference 2024/2857(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169857 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-10-169857,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169857}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169857},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169857, reference 2024/2857(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}