Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 1, after paragraph 3

The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

Vote
Amendment 1, after paragraph 3
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 10 Oct 2024
Result
59 for · 524 against · 30 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
10 October 2024, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0101/2024 – After § 3 – Am 1
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0118
Dossier
2024/2857(RSP)
Vote id
169856
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 59 for, 524 against, 30 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 10 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 1Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 14Against 36Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
S&DFor 0Against 114Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 71Abst. 0No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 2Against 156Abst. 0No vote 30 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 3Against 49Abst. 13No vote 21 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
ESNFor 1Against 16Abst. 4No vote 4 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
No groupFor 4Against 10Abst. 13No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium200
Czechia010
Germany0140
Denmark030
Spain210
Finland020
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania010
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 613 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169856
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 1, after paragraph 3 — The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas”. Vote, 10 October 2024. votingId 169856, reference 2024/2857(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169856 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-10-169856,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 1, after paragraph 3 — The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169856}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-10/169856},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169856, reference 2024/2857(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}