Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 7 Oct 2024
Result
189 for · 254 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 October 2024, 18:28
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group
Vote id
169726
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 189 for, 254 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 61Against 15Abst. 3No vote 57 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 0Against 48Abst. 3No vote 26 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 0Against 117Abst. 0No vote 70 of 187Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 31Against 5Abst. 1No vote 41 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 8Against 50Abst. 0No vote 28 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 0Against 12Abst. 0No vote 13 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 6Abst. 1No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Germany501
Spain030
Greece210
Poland010
Romania010
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 451 members

No vote recorded, 267

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 267 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment239 for, 353 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.79 426 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote288 for, 320 against, 69 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.76 427 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 21 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Amendment138 for, 378 against, 159 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 431 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Amendment 172, adding text after paragraph 79 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment254 for, 331 against, 72 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.75 417 voters
17 Jul 2024Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther149 for, 251 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 36 %r · shared0.73 286 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 28 — part 1 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment267 for, 197 against, 116 abstained Adopted For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.73 366 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.73 406 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9 Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in SudanAmendment206 for, 365 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.73 374 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 Public procurementAmendment227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.72 409 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 35 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment279 for, 333 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.72 403 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169726
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group”. Vote, 7 October 2024. votingId 169726. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169726 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-07-169726,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169726}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-07/169726},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169726. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}