Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 1

Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 1
Result
403 for · 159 against · 54 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 September 2024, 13:18
More facts (6)
Position
vote 22 of 55 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Patriots, S&D · separate vote: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0028/2024 – § 9/1
Vote id
169647
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 403 for, 159 against, 54 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Underlines that insufficient deliveries of ammunition and weapons and restrictions on their use risk undermining efforts made so far and deeply deplores the declining financial volume of bilateral military aid to Ukraine from Member States, despite the strong statements made at the beginning of this year; reiterates, therefore, its calls on the Member States to fulfil their commitment of March 2023 to deliver one million rounds of ammunition to Ukraine, to accelerate weapons deliveries, in particular of modern air defence systems and other weapons and ammunition in response to clearly identified needs, including Taurus missiles; calls for the swift implementation of the commitments made in joint security commitments between the EU and Ukraine;’ without the words ‘including Taurus missiles’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 9Against 23Abst. 8No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
GreensFor 41Against 7Abst. 2No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
S&DFor 105Against 6Abst. 5No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 4No vote 6 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 136Against 3Abst. 16No vote 33 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 34Against 28Abst. 5No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
PatriotsFor 7Against 46Abst. 12No vote 18 of 83Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.56
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 1No vote 2 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 4Against 24Abst. 1No vote 3 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0111
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania100
Poland030
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 616 members

No vote recorded, 102

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 102 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Jul 2024Paragraph 5 — part 4 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSplit vote393 for, 178 against, 75 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 563 voters
17 Jul 2024Paragraph 5 — part 6 The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSplit vote418 for, 168 against, 71 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 575 voters
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 19 — part 1 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote371 for, 156 against, 69 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.85 528 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Nov 2024Paragraph 13 — part 1 Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaSplit vote415 for, 98 against, 85 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.84 528 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionFinal442 for, 98 against, 126 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renew, EPP, The Leftr · shared0.84 575 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 15 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote448 for, 159 against, 65 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 581 voters
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 18 — part 4 2025 Commission report on UkraineSplit vote440 for, 167 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.84 551 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 6 — part 4 Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggressionSplit vote393 for, 234 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 577 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote409 for, 208 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 61 %Requested by Renew, EPPr · shared0.84 578 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote378 for, 160 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.84 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States”. Vote, 19 September 2024. votingId 169647, reference 2024/2799(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169647 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-09-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-09-19-169647,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 1 — Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member States}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-09-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169647}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169647},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169647, reference 2024/2799(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}