Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5, after paragraph 6

The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba

Vote
Amendment 5, after paragraph 6
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 19 Sept 2024
Result
219 for · 357 against · 41 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
19 September 2024, 13:12
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 14 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
RC-B10-0022/2024 – After § 6 – Am 5
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0022
Dossier
2024/2805(RSP)
Vote id
169537
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 5No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
S&DFor 104Against 13Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 11Against 59Abst. 2No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.73
EPPFor 1Against 154Abst. 0No vote 33 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 32Abst. 30No vote 21 of 83Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 1No vote 3 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 17Against 9Abst. 3No vote 3 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1401
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland200
France410
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia001
Netherlands600
Sweden003

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 617 members

No vote recorded, 101

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 101 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 536 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment186 for, 326 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 501 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 557 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 562 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 560 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment185 for, 334 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 489 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 Public procurementAmendment223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greens, ECRr · shared0.87 555 voters
18 Jun 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAmendment215 for, 313 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 492 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 559 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 561 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169537
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 5, after paragraph 6 — The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba”. Vote, 19 September 2024. votingId 169537, reference 2024/2805(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169537 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-09-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-09-19-169537,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5, after paragraph 6 — The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in Cuba}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-09-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169537}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-19/169537},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169537, reference 2024/2805(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}