Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2024
Result
437 for · 13 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2024, 18:31
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group
Vote id
169407
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 437 for, 13 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 95 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 24Against 5Abst. 2No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
GreensFor 42Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 89Against 0Abst. 0No vote 47 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 51Against 0Abst. 1No vote 25 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 122Against 0Abst. 0No vote 66 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 35Against 0Abst. 4No vote 39 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 49Against 6Abst. 0No vote 28 of 83Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 12Against 1Abst. 2No vote 10 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
No groupFor 13Against 0Abst. 2No vote 17 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium100
Czechia100
Germany1210
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland100
France300
Croatia100
Italy200
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Romania100
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 461 members

No vote recorded, 257

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 257 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169407
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group”. Vote, 16 September 2024. votingId 169407. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169407 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-09-16-169407,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169407}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169407},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169407. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}