Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2024
Result
102 for · 279 against · 13 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 September 2024, 18:28
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Vote id
169406
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 102 for, 279 against, 13 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 26 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 28Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 39Abst. 0No vote 14 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 60 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 40Abst. 0No vote 37 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 8Against 91Abst. 7No vote 82 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 50Against 1Abst. 0No vote 32 of 83Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ESNFor 8Against 0Abst. 0No vote 17 of 25Majority line ForClear line Too few voted Cohesion —
No groupFor 0Against 4Abst. 6No vote 22 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Germany600
France100
Poland100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 394 members

No vote recorded, 324

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 324 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendment 6, adding text after recital 17 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment197 for, 458 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.94 356 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.94 349 voters
27 Nov 2024Separate vote on paragraph 3 Presentation by the President-elect of the Commission of the College of Commissioners and its programmeSeparate vote200 for, 480 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 378 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 23 The need for EU support towards a just transition and reconstruction in SyriaAmendment185 for, 475 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 369 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 14 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment192 for, 439 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.93 341 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment190 for, 415 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 331 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 26 to Article 3, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2 Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movementAmendment205 for, 460 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 365 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment174 for, 446 against, 26 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by ECR, S&Dr · shared0.93 350 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 2 Clean Industrial DealAmendment178 for, 383 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 321 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN GroupOther109 for, 317 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.93 283 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169406
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 16 September 2024. votingId 169406. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169406 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-09-16-169406,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169406}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-09-16/169406},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169406. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}