Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group
Result
119 for · 337 against · 15 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 July 2024, 10:11
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Vote id
169368
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 119 for, 337 against, 15 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 25 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 32Abst. 0No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 71Abst. 1No vote 64 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 51Abst. 1No vote 25 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 1Against 137Abst. 8No vote 42 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 42 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 9Against 1Abst. 0No vote 15 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
No groupFor 13Against 0Abst. 5No vote 14 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus001
Czechia200
Germany204
Poland200
Romania200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 471 members

No vote recorded, 248

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 248 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 419 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 409 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 421 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 6, adding text after recital D Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment187 for, 419 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 403 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 27 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment187 for, 451 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 417 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 425 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 21 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment188 for, 448 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 427 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 430 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 428 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital 2 Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment179 for, 405 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 389 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 17 July 2024. votingId 169368. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169368 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-07-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-07-17-169368,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-07-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169368}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169368},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169368. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}