Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10, after paragraph 8

The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine

Vote
Amendment 10, after paragraph 8
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 17 Jul 2024
Result
63 for · 564 against · 42 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 July 2024, 13:48
More facts (6)
Position
vote 20 of 28 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0007/2024 – After § 8 – Am 10
Text
Motion B-10-2024-0007
Dossier
2024/2721(RSP)
Vote id
169357
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 63 for, 564 against, 42 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 9 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 8No vote 1 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
GreensFor 15Against 35Abst. 1No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
S&DFor 7Against 96Abst. 21No vote 12 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 1No vote 5 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 180Abst. 0No vote 7 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 0Against 72Abst. 1No vote 5 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 3No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 0No vote 1 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 2Against 21Abst. 7No vote 2 of 32Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Anna BRYŁKA changed group, Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Tomasz BUCZEK changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria050
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0130
Ireland031
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania030
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169357
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 10, after paragraph 8 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine”. Vote, 17 July 2024. votingId 169357, reference 2024/2721(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169357 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 July 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-07-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2024-07-17-169357,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10, after paragraph 8 — The need for the EU's continuous support for Ukraine}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-07-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169357}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-07-17/169357},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 169357, reference 2024/2721(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-07-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-07-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}